![]() For instance, within this concept, one of them can still be interpreted as an intrinsic or constitutive value and the other as an instrumental value. They can be regarded as conceptually related to each other, constituting libertas in a more general sense. It bears emphasizing, however, that the strong variant does not assume the identity of its constitutive elements, nor does it claim that they fuse into each other so that the one becomes indistinguishable from the other, and that one of these elements cannot be regarded as more important than the other. This standpoint, which we call “the strong variant of the Unity View”, implies that personal and political freedom are conceptually inseparable: one cannot define personal freedom without reference to political freedom (and vice versa). Though there are varying versions of this view, it is rarely formulated in the way we propose-viz., that freedo m is to be regarded as a unitary concept, encompassing both personal and political freedom. 1 In opposition, one may encounter an arguably less widespread “Unity View”, which holds that personal and political freedom are two aspects of a more general, unitary concept of freedom (which we shall call libertas). We label this dominant standpoint on the relationship between political and personal freedom “the Disunity View”. 2 Following Ian Carter, we understand constitutive value as a value that forms an element of other in (.)ġPolitical freedom (the core of which is the right to vote, to be eligible to run for public offices, and to participate in the process of political decision-making through engaging in democratic institutions) and personal/individual freedom (the core of which is constituted by various rights to non-interference, and positive rights, e.g., to education and health protection) are usually thought of as significantly different freedoms, which additionally remain is some tension so that one has to be given priority over the other.1 The disunity view is commonly endorsed by prominent political thinkers like Constant (1997), Dworki (.).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |